skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM ET on Friday, February 6 until 10:00 AM ET on Saturday, February 7 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Rios-Figueroa, Julio"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. The 2024–25 judicial reform in Mexico represents one of the most sweeping overhauls of a national judiciary in recent history. The reform replaced nearly all federal and state judges through direct popular elections, restructured the country’s highest court, and created new administrative and disciplinary bodies that expanded political influence over judicial decision-making. Here, in a conversation with Judicature International, AMANDA DRISCOLL, the Dr. J. Elizabeth Garraway Professor of Political Science at Florida State University, MICHAEL J.NELSON, Professor and Head of the Department of Political Science at Penn State, and JULIO RÍOS-FIGUEROA, Professor of Law at the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de M(ITAM) in Mexico City, bring their expertise on comparative judicial politics and the Mexican legal system. They analyze the design, implementation, and consequences of these reforms, assessing what they reveal about judicial independence, democratic legitimacy, and the potential risks of politicizing the judiciary. 
    more » « less